The Impact of Inotropes and Vasopressors on Cerebral Oxygenation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Narrative Review.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are critical neurological conditions that necessitate specialized care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Managing cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) is of primary importance in these patients. To maintain targeted MAP and CPP, vasopressors and/or inotropes are commonly used. However, their effects on cerebral oxygenation are not fully understood. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to date review regarding the current uses and pathophysiological issues related to the use of vasopressors and inotropes in TBI and SAH patients. According to our findings, despite achieving similar hemodynamic parameters and CPP, the effects of various vasopressors and inotropes on cerebral oxygenation, local CBF and metabolism are heterogeneous. Therefore, a more accurate understanding of the cerebral activity of these medications is crucial for optimizing patient management in the ICU setting.

Analgesic benefits of pre-operative versus postoperative transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been utilized to alleviate pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, the optimal timing of administration remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of pre-operative and postoperative TAP blocks as analgesic options after LC. METHODS: A frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. We systematically searched PubMed (via the National Library of Medicine), EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science up to March 2023. The study included RCTs that enrolled adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent LC and received either pre-operative or postoperative TAP blocks. The primary outcome assessed was 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption (mg). Additionally, pain rest scores within 3 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours, as well as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), were considered as pre-specified secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 34 trials with 2317 patients were included in the analysis. Postoperative TAP block demonstrated superiority over the pre-operative TAP block in reducing opioid consumption (MD 2.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.18, I2 98.6%, p < 0.001). However, with regards to postoperative pain, neither pre-operative nor postoperative TAP blocks exhibited superiority over each other at any of the assessed time points. The postoperative TAP block consistently ranked as the best intervention using SUCRA analysis. Moreover, the postoperative TAP block led to the most significant reduction in PONV. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the postoperative TAP block may be slightly more effective in reducing 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption and PONV when compared to the pre-operative TAP block. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42023396880 .

Enhancing study quality assessment: an in-depth review of risk of bias tools for meta-analysis-a comprehensive guide for anesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Yearly, a multitude of randomized controlled trials are published, overwhelming clinicians with conflicting information; this data saturation leads to confusion and hinders clinicians' everyday decision-making. Hence, it is crucial to assess the quality and reliability of the evidence in order to consolidate it. Through this synthesis, clinicians can guarantee that their decisions are informed by solid evidence. Meta-analysis, a statistical technique, can effectively combine data from multiple studies to furnish accurate and dependable evidence for clinical practice and policy decisions. Nonetheless, the reliability of the obtained results depends on the use of high-quality evidence. MAIN BODY: Risk of bias is an assessment mandatory while performing a meta-analysis and is used to have an overview of the quality of the studies from which data are extracted. Several tools have been developed and are used to perform the risk of bias assessment. In this statistical round, we will provide an overview of the most used tools for both the randomized (Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and Jadad) and the nonrandomized (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) clinical trials. CONCLUSION: We provided an overview of the most used risk of bias tools used in meta-analysis.

Erector Spinae Plane Block and Chronic Pain: An Updated Review and Possible Future Directions.

Chronic pain is a common, pervasive, and often disabling medical condition that affects millions of people worldwide. According to the Global Burden of Disease survey, painful chronic conditions are causing the largest numbers of years lived with disability worldwide. In America, more than one in five adults experiences chronic pain. Erector spinae plane block is a novel regional anesthesia technique used to provide analgesia with multiple possible uses and a relatively low learning curve and complication rate. Here, we review the erector spinae plane block rationale, mechanism of action and possible complications, and discuss its potential use for chronic pain with possible future directions for research.

General anesthesia or conscious sedation for thrombectomy in stroke patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment for stroke patients usually requires anesthesia care, with no current consensus on the best anesthetic management strategy. Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have attempted to address this. In 2022, additional evidence from three new trials was published: the GASS trial, the CANVAS II trial, and preliminary results from the AMETIS trial, prompting the execution of this updated systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of general anesthesia and conscious sedation on functional outcomes measured with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at three months. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating conscious sedation and general anesthesia in endovascular treatment. The following databases were examined: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews. The Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess bias. In addition, trial sequence analysis was performed on the primary outcome to estimate if the cumulative effect is significant enough to be unaffected by further studies. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials were identified, including 1,342 patients undergoing endovascular treatment for stroke. No significant differences were detected between general anesthesia and conscious sedation with regards to mRS, functional independence (mRS, 0-2), procedure duration, onset to reperfusion, mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay. Patients treated under general anesthesia may have more frequent successful reperfusion, though the time from groin to reperfusion was slightly longer. Trial sequential analysis showed that additional trials are unlikely to show marked differences in mean mRS at three months. CONCLUSIONS: In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, the choice of anesthetic strategy for endovascular treatment of stroke patients did not significantly impact functional outcome as measured with the mRS at three months. Patients managed with general anesthesia may have more frequent successful reperfusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022319368); registered 19 April 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le traitement endovasculaire pour les patient·es victimes d'un accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) nécessite généralement des soins d'anesthésie, mais il n'existe actuellement aucun consensus sur la meilleure stratégie de prise en charge anesthésique. Plusieurs études randomisées contrôlées et méta-analyses ont tenté d'aborder cette question. En 2022, des données probantes supplémentaires provenant de trois nouvelles études ont été publiées : l'étude GASS, l'étude CANVAS II et les résultats préliminaires de l'étude AMETIS, ce qui a motivé la réalisation de cette revue systématique et méta-analyse mises à jour. L'objectif principal de cette étude était d'évaluer les effets de l'anesthésie générale et de la sédation consciente sur les devenirs fonctionnels mesurés avec l'échelle de Rankin modifiée (mRS) à trois mois. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique avec méta-analyse d'études randomisées contrôlées portant sur la sédation consciente et l'anesthésie générale dans le traitement endovasculaire. Les bases de données suivantes ont été examinées : PubMed, Scopus, Embase et la base de données Cochrane des études randomisées contrôlées et des revues systématiques. L'outil Risque de biais 2 a été utilisé pour évaluer le biais. De plus, une analyse séquentielle des études a été effectuée sur le critère d'évaluation principal afin d'estimer si l'effet cumulatif était suffisamment significatif pour ne pas être affecté par d'autres études. RéSULTATS: Neuf études randomisées contrôlées ont été identifiées, incluant 1342 patient·es bénéficiant d'un traitement endovasculaire pour un AVC. Aucune différence significative n'a été détectée entre l'anesthésie générale et la sédation consciente en ce qui concerne la mRS, l'indépendance fonctionnelle (mRS, 0-2), la durée de l'intervention, le moment d'apparition de la reperfusion, la mortalité, la durée de séjour à l'hôpital et la durée de séjour en unité de soins intensifs. Les patient·es traité·es sous anesthésie générale pourraient avoir une reperfusion réussie plus fréquente, bien que le temps entre l'aine et la reperfusion était légèrement plus long. L'analyse séquentielle des études a montré qu'il est peu probable que d'autres études montrent des différences marquées dans la mRS moyenne à trois mois. CONCLUSION: Dans cette revue systématique et méta-analyse mises à jour, le choix de la stratégie anesthésique pour le traitement endovasculaire des personnes victimes d'un AVC n'a pas eu d'impact significatif sur les devenirs fonctionnels mesurés avec la mRS à trois mois. La réussite de la reperfusion pourrait être plus fréquente chez les patient·es pris·es en charge par anesthésie générale. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42022319368); enregistrée le 19 avril 2022.

Noninvasive respiratory support after extubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS), including high-flow nasal oxygen, bi-level positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure (noninvasive ventilation (NIV)), for preventing and treating post-extubation respiratory failure is still unclear. Our objective was to assess the effects of NRS on post-extubation respiratory failure, defined as re-intubation secondary to post-extubation respiratory failure (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), discomfort, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and time to re-intubation. Subgroup analyses considered "prophylactic" versus "therapeutic" NRS application and subpopulations (high-risk, low-risk, post-surgical and hypoxaemic patients). METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis (Research Registry: reviewregistry1435). PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science were searched (from inception until 22 June 2022). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of NRS after extubation in ICU adult patients were included. RESULTS: 32 RCTs entered the quantitative analysis (5063 patients). Compared with conventional oxygen therapy, NRS overall reduced re-intubations and VAP (moderate certainty). NIV decreased hospital mortality (moderate certainty), and hospital and ICU LOS (low and very low certainty, respectively), and increased discomfort (moderate certainty). Prophylactic NRS did not prevent extubation failure in low-risk or hypoxaemic patients. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic NRS may reduce the rate of post-extubation respiratory failure in ICU patients.

Chronic Pain and Regional Anesthesia: A Call to Action!

Chronic pain is an unwanted companion in the lives of millions of people worldwide, and findings show that more than one in fiveadults in America experience chronic pain [...].

Citing retracted literature: a word of caution.

INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate citation of retracted literature is a common problem in the general medical literature. In 2020, more than 2300 articles were retracted, a dramatic increase from 38 in 2000. By exploring a contemporary series of retractions by one research group, we aimed to evaluate if citations of retracted articles is occurring in the area of regional anesthesiology. METHODS: Using the Scopus database, we examined the full text of all the articles citing research articles coauthored by an anesthesiologist who had multiple articles retracted in 2022. After excluding the research articles citing non-retracted articles authored by the above mentioned anesthesiologist, we included in our analysis all the articles containing a retracted citation and published after the retraction notice. RESULTS: The search was performed on October 30, 2022, retrieving a total of 121 articles citing the researcher's work. Among the retrieved articles, 53 correctly cited non-retracted research and 37 were published before the retraction notice. Among the 31 remaining articles, 42 retracted research papers were cited. Twenty-five of the retracted articles were cited in the Discussion section of the manuscripts, 15 in the Introduction section, 1 in the Methods section (description of a technique), and one was cited in a review. No manuscript used the flawed data to calculate the sample size. DISCUSSION: In this contemporary example from the regional anesthesia literature, we identified that citation of retracted work remains a common phenomenon.

Reliability of Third Ventricle Assessment by Transcranial Ultrasound: A Computational Model of the Effect of Insonation Angle.

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial sonography (TCS) is a bedside examination which is currently used in multiple neurocritical care settings. Third ventricle ultrasound is usually a simple technique, though a large insonation angle could lead to an overestimation of third ventricular diameter. The aim of this study was to use a mathematical model to evaluate the impact of probe inclination on the false positive rate when using TCS to evaluate third ventricle enlargement. METHODS: Using R software, we simulated a pool of 100,000 fictitious patients with a normal third ventricle size (diameter from 0 to 9 mm) in daily follow-up for ventricle enlargement for 30 consecutive days using TCS. Each day, a different, random insonation angle (α) was generated and a corresponding measured diameter calculated as: measured diameter=real diameter/cos α. If the measured diameter was >9.0 mm, the simulation registered a "misdiagnosis" episode and the simulation loop was interrupted; otherwise, the simulation continued to its thirtieth iteration. RESULTS: Of the 100,000 "patient" simulations, 30,905 (30.9%) had an erroneous TCS diagnosis of ventricular enlargement. Angles of insonation >35 degrees contributed to 79.3% of the total misdiagnoses of ventricular enlargement (false positive rate, 3.71%), whereas misdiagnosis was rare when the insonation angle was ≤15 degrees (1.30% of the total misdiagnoses; false positive rate, 0.06%). CONCLUSION: Using probe inclinations <15 degrees, erroneous diagnosis of third ventricular enlargement was rare. Our results suggest that TCS has a low rate of false positives when the angle of insonation is minimized.

Single-shot regional anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Different regional anesthesia (RA) techniques have been used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), but there is no consensus on their comparative effectiveness. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of RA techniques on patients undergoing LC using a network meta-analysis approach. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index) using the following PICOS criteria: (P) adult patients undergoing LC; (I) any RA single-shot technique with injection of local anesthetics; (C) placebo or no intervention; (O) postoperative opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MME), rest pain at 12 h and 24 h post-operation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of stay; and (S) randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: A total of 84 studies were included. With the exception of the rectus sheath block (P = 0.301), the RA techniques were superior to placebo at reducing opioid consumption. Regarding postoperative pain, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block (-1.80 on an 11-point pain scale) and erector spinae plane (ESP) block (-1.33 on an 11-point pain scale) were the most effective at 12 and 24 h. The TAP block was also associated with the greatest reduction in PONV. CONCLUSIONS: RA techniques are effective at reducing intraoperative opioid use, postoperative pain, and PONV in patients undergoing LC. Patients benefit the most from the bilateral paravertebral, ESP, quadratus lumborum, and TAP blocks.

The Impact of New Treatments on Short- and MID-Term Outcomes in Bilateral Lung Transplant: A Propensity Score Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite many efforts to improve organ preservation and recipient survival, overall lung transplant (LT) mortality is still high. We aimed to investigate the impact of 'prophylactic' veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and tacrolimus on 72-h primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and 30-day acute cellular rejection, respectively. METHODS: All consecutive LT patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Padua University Hospital (February, 2016-2022) were screened. Only adult patients undergoing first bilateral LT and not requiring cardio-pulmonary bypass, invasive mechanical ventilation, and/or ECMO before LT, were included. A propensity score weighting analysis was employed to account for the non-random allocation of the subjects to different treatments. RESULTS: A total of 128 LT recipients were enrolled. Compared to the 'off-pump'-group (n.47, 37%), 'prophylactic' VA ECMO (n.51,40%) recorded similar 72-h PGD values, perioperative blood products and lower acute kidney dysfunction. Compared with cyclosporine (n.86, 67%), tacrolimus (n.42, 33%) recorded a lower risk of 30-day cellular rejection, kidney dysfunction, and bacteria isolation. CONCLUSIONS: 'Prophylactic' VA ECMO recorded 72-h PGD values comparable to the 'off-pump'-group; while tacrolimus showed a lower incidence of 30-day acute cellular rejection.

SOFIA Nonwire Advancement techniKE 35 Technique: A Minimalist Approach to Stroke Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: The Soft Torqueable Catheter Optimized for Intracranial Access (SOFIA) is a catheter designed to enable intracranial access, allowing for advancement, at least partially, without a microcatheter by a technique called SOFIA Nonwire Advancement techniKE (SNAKE). We propose a variation of this technique, called SOFIA Nonwire Advancement techniKE 35 (SNAKE35), in which the catheter is navigated by the intracatheter support of a 0.035-inch guidewire, allowing for rapid, distal intracranial access through a biaxial technique. OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a modified navigation technique in the setting of acute stroke thrombectomy. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a thrombectomy procedure between January 2017 and February 2019 were retrospectively identified at our institution. The primary end point was defined as successful positioning of the catheter at the proximal end of the occlusion with the sole use of the SNAKE35 technique. Secondary end points were defined as complications, reperfusion times, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scores. RESULTS: Among 140 patients, SNAKE35 was attempted in 79 patients (SNAKE35 group), while traditional navigation was used in the remaining 61 patients (conventional group). Of the total 79 cases, SNAKE35 was successful in positioning the catheter at the proximal end of the occlusion in 66 cases (84%). Of these, 54 cases were completed solely with aspiration techniques. Groin puncture to revascularization time averaged 26 minutes in the SNAKE35 group and 37 minutes in the conventional group ( P < .05), despite older age ( P < .001) and increased use of conscious sedation ( P < .001) in the SNAKE35 group. CONCLUSION: SNAKE35 is an effective and safe technique for SOFIA navigation up to the site of intracranial occlusion in the anterior circulation leading to significant decrease of procedural times.

Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients with Severe Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure: Non-Invasive Ventilation vs. Straight Intubation-A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Cohort Study.

The best timing for endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) remains debated. Aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hARF receiving either a trial of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or intubated with no prior attempt of NIV ("straight intubation"). All consecutive patients admitted to the 25 participating ICUs were included and divided in two groups: the "straight intubation" group and the "NIV" group. A propensity score matching was performed to correct for biases associated with the choice of the respiratory support. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of mechanical ventilation, hospital stay and reintubation rate. A total of 704 COVID-19 patients were admitted to ICUs during the study period. After matching, 141 patients were included in each group. No clinically relevant difference at ICU admission was found between groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the NIV group (22.0% vs. 36.2%), with no significant difference in secondary endpoints. There was no significant mortality difference between patients who received straight intubation and those intubated after NIV failure. In COVID-19 patients with hARF it is worth and safe attempting a trial of NIV prior to intubation.